Comment
What is the purpose for defining inert fill in reg 347?
If inert fill was to be removed entirely from Reg 347, what would that change?
The current proposed definition includes "waste" and "earth" this leads to confusion.
Perhaps, we could think of 'inert" in the context of the receiving site. For example, a table X soil received at a table X site is inert.
[Original Comment ID: 209604]
Submitted February 8, 2018 1:41 PM
Comment on
Excess soil management regulatory proposal
ERO number
013-0299
Comment ID
259
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status