Commentaire
What is the purpose for defining inert fill in reg 347?
If inert fill was to be removed entirely from Reg 347, what would that change?
The current proposed definition includes "waste" and "earth" this leads to confusion.
Perhaps, we could think of 'inert" in the context of the receiving site. For example, a table X soil received at a table X site is inert.
[Original Comment ID: 209604]
Soumis le 8 février 2018 1:41 PM
Commentaire sur
Projet de règlement sur la gestion de la terre d'excavation
Numéro du REO
013-0299
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
259
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire