I understand that the main…

ERO number

019-0405

Comment ID

33623

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses

Comment

I understand that the main problem with the population crash is ,Over harvest by hunters,/Black bear populations are high. ,thus calf loss is high. / Long seasons in some area during snowfall and easier to harvest at the time during snowfall..Wolf populations are high in some areas . So each problem should be addressed in separate manners.. First would be human harvest. One would be quite harsh and that would be an alternating moratorium on hunting moose. One example would be complete ban on hunting moose every other year. Second could be certain Hunting zones could be banned alternating bans every other year.Or maybe no calf harvest or cows for lets say 5 years in highly hunted areas or easily hunted areas with many roads? Changing the length of the season eliminating hunting during the latter part of November and all of December because of snow fall and easy to hunt moose in snow? Moving on to the bear predation. You could give moose hunters who are successful in getting an adult tag a free bear tag with their moose licence giving them an way to hunt another species and bringing down the bear population? Also for spring bear hunters 2 bear tags on one licence.That would spark the interest in more hunters hunting in the spring. Finally allow hunters to hunt wolves during the moose and deer hunting seasons as well as during the late winter everywhere. As for the allocating of tags such as draws That would be maybe everyone has the same chance in draws everyone pays a minimal price to get in the draw. Every year everyone starts at the same place in the draw. Another would be that if you want to hunt moose you can only have two hunting zones you can apply each year. Lets say if you are successful you will not be able to hunt for 3 years. If there is party hunting then if the party is successful all of them can`t apply for 3 years or what ever is decided on how many years. My ideas are all based on bringing the moose population higher. Is that not what the goal is? You can make the draw system different but if you don't bring down the number of hunters in all aspects of hunting times ,or how many in a party . The decision of harvest should not be a blame game. It all comes down to sacrifice and that means Less hunting and harder to harvest at certain times. If there was more educating hunters on how bad the population is and how every moose hunter has to sacrifice I think there may be more supportive. Maybe a pamphlet sent out to all hunters that our moose population is in trouble? Springing on regulations with no education is troubling to hunters and can sour them as well. We all need to know more and a pamphlet can be worth a thousand moose?