Comment
I support the extensi
However a 2 year extension period is ‎too short. A period of 5 years is more reasonable for a panel to do its work effectively and work through the very complex issues associated with forestry operating under the Crown Forest Sustainability Act and protecting species under the ESA.
The extension must be implemented as soon as possible after the 45 day review period in order to ensure it is in place well in advance of the July expiry of the current Section 55 Regulation.
The result of an inadequate solution to the ESA will be catastrophic wood supply reductions, mill closures, contractors out of business, stranded First Nation investments in the forestry economy, and severe socio-economic and community impacts due to the loss of sustainable employment.
The forest industry is a livelihood for many in Northern Ontario and I. Without it we would not have the means to support our young and growing family. If the proposed policies and prescriptions are implemented in their current form; we would be forced to uproot our children and move away from our family and home community of Thunder Bay.
[Original Comment ID: 212878]
Submitted March 6, 2018 2:57 PM
Comment on
Amendments of Ontario Regulation 242/08 (General Regulation - Endangered Species Act, 2007) relating to forest operations in managed Crown forests, incorporating species recently listed to the Species at Risk in Ontario List, and safe harbour
ERO number
013-1669
Comment ID
3570
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status