Comment
This is incredibly wrong, and is going to have detrimental impacts on species at risk. This gives an incentive for habitat destruction, thus resulting in a loss of habitat for species. It works against the protection/recovery of these species, it fails to ensure transparency with respect to site-specific and cumulative harm to the habitat of at-risk species.
Honestly I fail to understand how this could ever be deemed “ok”, when it’s obvious we need to be making a stand for a more sustainable future and assist in recovering our biodiversity when this is taking steps backwards.
Submitted December 18, 2020 6:19 PM
Comment on
A proposal under the Endangered Species Act to enable use of the Species at Risk Conservation Fund and to streamline authorizations for certain activities that impact species at risk, while maintaining protections for species at risk
ERO number
019-2636
Comment ID
50414
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status