reading the proposed changes…

reading the proposed changes I find that once again the system is managing the hunter , not the wildlife. I am sure some of these locals could sustain an extra few days of hunting ,however that is not managing wildlife . I HUNT IN A COUPLE OF WMU (NOT ANY LISTED) I have seen over the last few years a decline in numbers of both deer and turkey, ( 91b) in particular. I have tried for years to get someone to give me the density of deer in 91b and have never received an answer , without this type of information I find it hard to understand how anyone can set limits . I see no data supporting these changes , just assumptions. One needs to follow the science of management not just speculate or appease special interest groups . by the way I hunt with both gun and bow .I would like to see the science behind these changes . thank you