Comment
The greenbelt should be protected lands. It is designated that way for a reason, and moving the boundaries sets a dangerous precedent for future changes to it.
We have the space in non-green belt lands to build more housing. We should be building more medium and high density housing (condos and town homes) in existing suburbs. I don't understand how designating more land for development will solve a housing crisis when the clear solution is increased densification in the GTA.
Suburban sprawl must stop being the goto solution for housing development. Protected lands must remain protected.
Submitted November 8, 2022 10:47 PM
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
ERO number
019-6217
Comment ID
63718
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status