Against the motion because…

ERO number

019-6218

Comment ID

66451

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses

Comment

Against the motion because the land is a conservation land and not for profit. The location of the proposed housing should also be reconsidered because of its environmental impact, in addition to the proposed housing units need to be affordable, in high density, and for people of lower income rather than the complete opposite.