Comment
The proposed changes will result in one province wide regulation for all CA’s to implement. From a Planning Ecology perspective the proposed changes to remove Conservation of Land and Pollution will impact the CA’s ability to maintain important ecosystem services which benefit the entire NPCA watershed. Wetlands and watercourses and their respective buffer areas are critical for ensuring water quality and quantity objectives are met, limiting the CA’s ability to regulate certain aspects of these features will not result in positive outcomes for water quality, quantity or biodiversity.
It's noted that the proposed change to the definition of a watercourse will prevent Conservation Authorities from regulating many headwater drainage features and higher order streams which lack definable bed, and banks or sides. There is a significant amount of scientific literature available which demonstrates the importance of headwater drainage features and higher order streams in providing and maintaining water quantity and quality. Limiting the CA’s ability to regulate these features while requiring them to ensure that flooding and erosion concerns are not impacted downstream is not an effective proposal. Rather than limiting the ability of the CA to regulate these features, there would be benefit to incorporating a definition of headwater drainage features in the Act and maintaining the existing definition of a watercourse in order to recognize the critical function these features play in watersheds.
Submitted November 23, 2022 1:06 PM
Comment on
Proposed updates to the regulation of development for the protection of people and property from natural hazards in Ontario
ERO number
019-2927
Comment ID
71843
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status