Comment
New homes and affordable homes are desperately needed. The green belt should not be touched to achieve this. The government appears to be favoring private developers and does not present a reasonable case as to why protected lands must be developed. There are many experts on urban intensification and many academics and other professionals that have highlighted the grave issues with this plan and the more effective alternatives that exist. I hope that those responsible for this proposal have thoroughly examined other options. The greenbelt is not to be used as a developers investment tool, or a trough to keep coming to, it is mean for something more, something to save and protect, this is very disappointing, and appears to have questionable motives.
Submitted November 27, 2022 6:39 AM
Comment on
Decision on proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation
ERO number
019-6217
Comment ID
73850
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status