Your plan just talks about…

Your plan just talks about building more housing, some of it on land currently in the greenbelt. You propose to compensate the greenbelt by adding other land to the greenbelt. Where is the environmental review or comment from conservation authorities about comparing the land you want to remove to the land you propose to add? I fear that you are ignoring the original reason for the greenbelt boundaries and plan to shift them just because you want houses on some of that land. Put the houses somewhere else, like intensifying population inside urban boundaries, or on land already outside of the greenbelt.