Comment
I read through the housing supply section (#1) of the environmental registry hoping to read the other sections but couldn't.
Here's why.
1) minimum density targets: do you mean like at the south west corner of Bloor and Bathurst in Toronto - the former Honest Ed's. I have never in all my urban travels ( which are considerable ) seen such appalling density being newly constructed and then posing as "downtown urban living" . New York, Hong Kong, Beijing..never!! It is not surprising that the public believes that government is in the "pockets of the developers."
2) "transit -supportive greenfield density targets".. What the hell does that mean?
3) "intensification policies" . Don't you mean non intensification policies? Or maybe not.
4) "more housing on farms".. Good idea. Throw out all the swine (i.e.farmers) and let them move over to the government troughs .
Submitted May 14, 2023 3:44 PM
Comment on
Review of proposed policies adapted from A Place to Grow and Provincial Policy Statement to form a new provincial planning policy instrument.
ERO number
019-6813
Comment ID
87286
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status