I strongly oppose the…

I strongly oppose the proposed amendment to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997, and its associated regulations. This amendment seeks to permit the issuance of licenses for new dog train and trial areas, as well as the transfer of licenses. Such a change would have detrimental effects on our wildlife and natural ecosystems.

Allowing for new dog train and trial areas would disrupt the delicate balance of our wildlife habitats. Dogs, especially when used for training and trial purposes, can have significant negative impacts on native wildlife populations. Their presence can disturb and stress wildlife, disrupt breeding patterns, damage habitats, and even lead to the spread of diseases. This amendment disregards the importance of preserving our natural environments and the species that depend on them.

Furthermore, the transfer of licenses creates a potential for unchecked expansion and abuse. Transferring licenses could result in the proliferation of dog train and trial areas without proper oversight and consideration of the environmental consequences. This amendment fails to prioritize the well-being of our ecosystems and the protection of our wildlife.

In light of these concerns, I implore you to reconsider this amendment and prioritize the conservation and protection of our natural heritage. We should be focusing on preserving and restoring our wildlife habitats, not introducing measures that have the potential to harm them. Our duty is to safeguard the integrity of our ecosystems for future generations, and this amendment undermines that fundamental responsibility.