Comment
1) I am always concerned about the Suttle wording and redefining language this government uses - ie. Looking at the definition of "significant" with regards to wetlands, forests, etc. I don't get the impression you see the significance in them
2) I see how disappointed municipalities are with your growth plans. We want change and growth, but you want money and to make developers rich. We are aware growth is needed but you want the lowest density possible - I don't understand that. What about the voted on growth option for halton hills? Hamilton?
3) Natural heritage - I think buildings yes, need to be looked at. Ie. The Hide house in Acton, and old mansions, yes, build up. Build up on grocery stores. Build up on shoppers drugmarts. Build up! Not out in to wet lands and natural resources, wetlands and forests, rivers.
4) what are you doing to protect grassland birds? How can you not see they directly impact the health of.our environment, our wellbeing and livelihood. Why tear up all of the farmland? It's just so sad to watch this.
So sad to.watch the province of Ontario humiliate us.
Submitted July 27, 2023 9:14 PM
Comment on
Review of proposed policies adapted from A Place to Grow and Provincial Policy Statement to form a new provincial planning policy instrument.
ERO number
019-6813
Comment ID
92165
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status