Comment
Expediency seems to be the only rationale for adding 6 more categories of waste to the list of wastes that are eligible for registration under EASR.
These 6 activities were exempted from eligibility for EASR; what has changed?
Asbestos waste, hazardous waste and biomedical waste have the potential to cause serious harm to the natural environment and human health.
Shifting these activities to EASR will necessitate more inspections and rule-enforcement. The MECP inspection branch is chronically under funded and prosecutions are expensive and time-cosuming.
The minimum liability insurance should be at least $2M and all spills should be reported to the public.
Submitted October 21, 2023 3:27 PM
Comment on
Streamlining environmental permissions for waste management systems under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry
ERO number
019-6963
Comment ID
93717
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status