I object to the changes in…

I object to the changes in how aggregate extraction permits are to be approved, given the effect pits and quarries can have on communities, neighbours, traffic, the environment, property values, and quality of life.

1- public notification, consultation and input need to continue to be an integral part of licence application and permit granting for aggregate extraction in pits and quarries

2- the process of public consultation and structured ministry review is the only proper approach. Substituting this with evaluations by “Qualified Persons” hired by the proponent is beyond unreasonable. Those who evaluate and approve applications related to aggregate extraction and water management on pit sites shouldn’t be hired by the proponent, must be a representative of an arms length authority

3- studies must be done to fully understand the impact of water taking on each individual site

4- public consultation and input need to continue to be part of the granting of water taking permits

5- Conservation Authorities need to be restored as stakeholders in the consideration and granting of permissions for water taking in any area

6- With regards to streamlining environmental permissions for stormwater management under the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry:

a) first and foremost the aggregate extraction industry should be considered an ineligible industry, like mining, for EASR permitting

a) public consultation needs to be formally included in any form of application process that may be allowed to go forward

b) Conservation Authorities need to be involved in planning and oversight of stormwater management on any aggregate extraction site