Comment
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on ERO 019-8462. Please note that I am NOT in favour of the following proposals, and I strongly request that these be removed from Bill 185.
As usual all these seem to favour suburban sprawl, boundary expansions and profit for developers at the expanse of the people of this province.
I am against the following:
The reinstatement of the appeal rights for private developers to be able to challenge a municipality at the OLT when that municipality says no to an urban boundary expansion request. These appeal rights were removed in 2006 because they promote 1950’s-style suburban sprawl and favour developers’ profits over sound municipal planning. We must focus on building infill development such as fourplexes, which will control sprawl, save farmland, wetlands and woodlots, and mitigate the effects of the climate emergency.
A prohibition on third party appeals - which would prevent community members from challenging planning decisions that we don't support.
Transfer of planning responsibilities from regional governments to lower tier municipalities which don't have the resources and expertise to plan effectively and regionally. This will open up lower tier municipalities to pressure from private sector developers who seek profit at the expense of regular Ontarians.
Changes to pre-consultation where local government and often community have the opportunity to learn, provide input and influence development in our communities. Proposed changes would weaken the voice of local councils and community members.
Submitted April 14, 2024 9:23 PM
Comment on
Review of proposed policies for a new provincial planning policy instrument.
ERO number
019-8462
Comment ID
98207
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status