Comment
First off, it features two elements that should be separate.
A rural highway and a clause on urban bike lanes are two pieces on their own.
Secondly, where are the laws targeting those who block intersections?
The number of people who go and sit in a turning lane to cut around me to go forward(instead of turning on the red when it was clear and approved) has been absurd lately.
Thirdly, any laws on removing protections for alternative transportation must replace them.
There is no wording on this. Just a verbal promise from one of the politicians pushing it.
It needs actual punishment for those who cut off and injure cyclists, with funding for traffic cameras to keep an eye out for these infractions.
Fourthwise, any lack of environmental inspections on the impact of a new highway must be done.
Will the parties responsible be willing to pay the suit for the impact this will have?
No?
Then they must be done.
Submitted October 23, 2024 3:56 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
103216
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status