Comment
Shortsighted and Driver-Centric: Bill 212 Ignores Public Transit and Active Transportation
While the bill focuses on easing traffic for drivers, it overlooks the broader impact on cyclists, non-drivers, and public transit users. Several key questions remain unanswered:
• How does the bill address the needs of the 65% of Torontonians who do not drive to work?
• Why is there no provision for expanding or protecting bike lanes amidst construction, especially when cycling has become a vital mode of transport for many?
• What plans exist to ensure public transportation, which has been underfunded and deteriorating, will not suffer further due to the prioritization of highways?
Recommendations:
1. Reallocate funds to public transit: Investing in TTC improvements and expanding bus and subway lines would benefit more residents, reduce congestion, and ensure equity for non-drivers.
2. Protect active transit infrastructure: Ensure that bike lanes and pedestrian routes are enhanced, not neglected, during and after construction projects.
3. Focus on long-term solutions: Address root causes of congestion through public and active transportation improvements rather than expanding highways, which risk encouraging more car use and urban sprawl.
Without considering these factors, the proposal feels hasty and one-sided, failing to serve the needs of all city residents.
Supporting links
Submitted October 24, 2024 9:41 AM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
104307
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status