Bill 212, aimed at reducing …

Bill 212, aimed at reducing "gridlock," is criticized for potentially harming public health, safety, mobility, and the environment. The bill's requirement for provincial approval of new bike lanes that replace traffic lanes is seen as an overreach of government authority and a lack of trust in local democracy. This approach contradicts extensive municipal planning processes that include research and community input.

The concept of Induced Demand suggests that adding more car lanes actually increases traffic, contrary to the bill's objectives. Critics argue that to truly reduce gridlock, the government should invest heavily in transit projects and comprehensive cycling networks. Bike lanes are highlighted as an efficient use of road space, with each cyclist representing one less car on the road. Additionally, areas with bike lanes have shown increased success for local businesses.

The bill's impact on cycling infrastructure is a major concern. Cycling is presented as a healthier transportation option that leads to better health outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. Bike lanes are also credited with improving overall street safety for all users and providing greater accessibility to those who can't afford cars. The removal of existing bike lanes in Toronto is criticized, given their high usage and the recent cyclist fatalities in the city.
The bill's proposal to exempt Highway 413 lands from environmental assessments is viewed as short-sighted and potentially disastrous for the environment. Critics argue that paving over environmentally sensitive land will permanently destroy natural habitats, carbon sinks, and flood control measures. The exemption is seen as a disregard for environmental concerns and contradictory to the goal of reducing gridlock. The summary concludes that Bill 212 will likely worsen gridlock, public safety, local economies, and health outcomes while causing irreparable environmental damage.

This is one of the most regressive bills I have seen in a very long time, and I will never vote for anyone who has supported this bill