I am writing to express my…

I am writing to express my deep frustration with the recent proposal outlined in Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024, particularly the framework regarding bike lanes that necessitates the removal of existing traffic lanes. This approach raises several significant concerns that merit immediate attention.

First and foremost, the bill fails to differentiate between various types of streets and neighborhoods. Not all roads are created equal, and a one-size-fits-all policy risks undermining local initiatives aimed at improving transportation options tailored to specific community needs. The absence of red tape and bureaucratic obstacles for local governments is essential for fostering innovative solutions to our transportation challenges. Removing bike lanes only serves to exacerbate car congestion, counteracting the very goal of this legislation.

As an active user of bike lanes, I can attest to their importance as essential transportation infrastructure. These lanes not only promote cycling as a viable commuting option but also enhance overall road safety. The removal of bike lanes would increase risks for cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers alike. Bike lanes serve as a crucial buffer, separating vulnerable road users from motor vehicle traffic. When cyclists are relegated to shared spaces with cars, the likelihood of accidents increases, jeopardizing public safety.

Moreover, the existence of dedicated bike lanes facilitates a smoother flow of traffic for drivers by reducing conflicts between different modes of transportation. When cyclists have designated paths, they are less likely to interfere with car traffic, resulting in less frustration for all road users. This separation can lead to a more organized and efficient road system, ultimately benefiting everyone.

Additionally, bike lanes support various forms of transit, making them more accessible and encouraging a shift away from single-occupancy vehicle use. By promoting cycling and walking, we can create a multi-modal transportation network that alleviates congestion, reduces emissions, and enhances the overall quality of life in our communities.

In conclusion, I urge you to reconsider the implications of Bill 212 as it relates to bike lane infrastructure. Removing these lanes not only jeopardizes the safety of cyclists but also undermines broader efforts to improve our transportation system. Let us work together to find solutions that enhance mobility for everyone, rather than reverting to outdated practices that prioritize cars over people.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter. I look forward to your response and hope to see a reconsideration of this bill’s approach.