I am writing to express my…

I am writing to express my opposition to Ontario Bill 212, a proposal that introduces substantial issues across its provisions for bike lanes and highways. This bill, if passed, would have unintended consequences that impact residents and the environment negatively.

Increased Red Tape: Bill 212 introduces unnecessary regulatory hurdles that complicate urban planning and infrastructure projects, particularly regarding bike lanes and highway improvements. Rather than streamlining processes for building safe and efficient transportation routes, the bill burdens municipalities and contractors with excessive compliance requirements. This red tape slows progress, increases costs, and hampers the adaptability of cities to evolve their infrastructure to meet residents' needs.

Environmental Impact: The environmental implications of Bill 212 are concerning. This legislation threatens Ontario’s climate goals by impeding the development of bike lanes, which are an essential part of reducing vehicle emissions. By restricting these sustainable transport options, the bill pushes people back to cars, worsening air pollution, congestion, and greenhouse gas emissions. Moreover, additional regulatory requirements for highways could lead to increased construction times and resource use, further harming the environment.

Restriction of Choice: By limiting the options for alternative transportation, the bill restricts the freedom of Ontario residents to choose eco-friendly and health-conscious modes of travel, such as cycling. This is a step backward for public health and urban mobility, as it limits accessible and sustainable transportation options that have become crucial for many Ontarians, especially in urban centers.

Serious Safety Concerns: Finally, Bill 212’s restrictions on bike lane expansion raise significant safety concerns. Without sufficient infrastructure for cyclists, there is an increased risk of accidents and conflicts with motor vehicles. For highways, the additional regulatory constraints on development and maintenance may lead to delays in crucial safety upgrades, endangering drivers and commuters. Safety should be a priority, and this bill does not adequately address the safety needs of all road users.

In summary, Ontario Bill 212, as currently structured, is a step in the wrong direction. It burdens Ontario with excessive regulation, harms the environment, restricts residents’ choices, and jeopardizes public safety. I strongly urge a reconsideration of this bill to prioritize streamlined, environmentally friendly, and safety-oriented policies for Ontario’s transportation future.