I am writing to express my…

I am writing to express my strong opposition to Bill 212, the Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024. The proposed legislation to remove bike lanes on key streets in Toronto, including Bloor Street, Yonge Street, and University Avenue, is deeply concerning for several reasons.

Firstly, the removal of bike lanes undermines the progress we have made towards creating a sustainable and environmentally friendly transportation system. Cycling is a vital component of reducing traffic congestion and lowering greenhouse gas emissions. By eliminating these bike lanes, we risk increasing reliance on motor vehicles, which exacerbates air pollution and contributes to climate change—issues that we should be actively addressing, not reversing.

Furthermore, the proposal to allow provincial approval for existing bike lanes could lead to the systematic dismantling of cycling infrastructure that has been carefully planned and implemented to enhance urban mobility. The criteria for review, while they may consider environmental implications, seem to prioritize the convenience of motor vehicle traffic over the safety and accessibility of cyclists and pedestrians. This is contrary to the principles of sustainable urban development, which advocate for balanced transportation options that prioritize the safety and well-being of all road users.

The notion that the removal of bike lanes will alleviate gridlock and enhance the flow of traffic overlooks the realities of urban transport dynamics. Studies have shown that integrating cycling into the transportation mix reduces congestion and encourages healthier, more active lifestyles. Instead of dismantling existing infrastructure, we should be investing in expanding and improving it, fostering a culture of cycling that benefits the community as a whole.

I am also concerned about the implications of exempting these actions from the Environmental Assessment Act. This exemption undermines the democratic process of community consultation and environmental review, which are essential for informed decision-making. We must ensure that the voices of residents and stakeholders are heard when it comes to changes that impact our urban landscape and quality of life.

In conclusion, I urge you to oppose Bill 212 and advocate for policies that support, rather than dismantle, cycling infrastructure in Ontario. We should prioritize the development of safe, sustainable transportation options that benefit all citizens, not just a select few.