Comment
I strongly disagree with the proposed Bill 212, specifically the sections pertaining to the removal of existing bike lanes to reinstate vehicle lanes.
Bike lanes are a crucial component of urban infrastructure, promoting not only environmental sustainability but also public health, safety, and social well-being.
I personally cycle to work and extracurricular activities every day all year round. I rely on the protected bike lanes on Bloor/Danforth to safely and quickly travel across the city. Without these bike lanes, there is no way for me to safely cross this section of the city on bicycle.
Studies have shown that while there is a slow down to vehicular traffic, it is often under 1 minute slower. Is 1 minute of added travel time really worth risking the lives of people who need to bike on these roads?
While the intention behind Bill 212 is to reduce traffic congestion, the removal of bike lanes is likely to contribute to more traffic! Bike lanes can help alleviate vehicle congestion by providing people an alternative to driving. The less protected bike lanes we have, the fewer people feel safe cycling at all!! Often leading to more cars on the road and increased traffic.
Submitted November 6, 2024 11:05 AM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
113598
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status