I have significant concerns…

I have significant concerns regarding Ontario Bill 212 (Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024). The proposal to remove bike lanes as a strategy to reduce traffic congestion is fundamentally flawed and lacks empirical support. Evidence consistently shows that removing bike lanes does not alleviate traffic congestion; in fact, it often exacerbates it.

For instance, when bike lanes were removed from Jarvis Street in 2011, the city’s own data revealed that travel times increased and traffic flow worsened. This measure not only failed to reduce congestion but also compromised safety, leading to more accidents and fatalities. These incidents result in higher costs for healthcare, emergency services, and legal expenses, ultimately burdening taxpayers.

Investing in bike lanes and other sustainable transportation options is a more effective approach. It promotes safety, reduces reliance on cars, and supports a healthier, more active population. This, in turn, can lead to long-term savings in healthcare and infrastructure maintenance.

Instead of dismantling bike lanes, the province should focus on initiatives that directly benefit residents, such as improving healthcare and education. These investments will serve the long-term interests of Ontarians far better than short-sighted measures aimed at placating a specific group of commuters.

In summary, Bill 212 represents a step backward for Toronto and the province. Sustainable urban planning should prioritize multimodal transportation solutions that enhance safety, efficiency, and environmental responsibility. The government’s focus should be on creating a livable, accessible city for everyone, not just accommodating those who drive into the city for work.