The shear audacity of this…

The shear audacity of this is mind blowing. The loss of legal protections for endangered and threatened species would accelerate biodiversity decline. Ontario is home to more than 230 species listed as at risk, including the Blanding's turtle, the eastern small-footed bat, and the monarch butterfly. These species rely on targeted protections and habitat preservation measures to survive.
The ecological damage resulting from a repeal would have serious ripple effects across ecosystems. Endangered species often play key roles in their environments — as pollinators, predators, seed dispersers, or prey. Their decline can destabilize ecosystems, leading to cascading effects that harm other species, including those important to agriculture, forestry, and fisheries.

The notion of "special economic zones" is repulsive. ANY conservative government should pride itself on science-based policy-making. This means using logic, not feelings when it comes to policy. While it is sometimes argued by those that do not understand economics that environmental protections hinder economic growth, evidence shows that sustainable development — which balances conservation with economic activity — is more resilient and beneficial in the long run. Healthy ecosystems contribute to tourism, agriculture, clean water, and climate regulation. Ignoring environmental limits may lead to short-term gains for a few industries but imposes long-term costs on the public and future generations.

This government needs to STRENGTHEN the ESA not repeal it. Give it teeth. Protecting endangered species is not a luxury — it is a necessity for a healthy, sustainable, and just society.