Dear ERO, I am writing as a…

Dear ERO,

I am writing as a concerned Canadian citizen and Indigenous person to formally complain about the proposed legislative amendments to the Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act, 2006 (PPCRA) and the Historical Parks Act (HPA). These changes, focused on Wasaga Beach Provincial Park, prioritize short-term tourism and economic gains over the long-term protection of natural and cultural heritage. This approach not only harms the area's longstanding ecological integrity, but also clashes with core Canadian values of environmental stewardship and respect for Indigenous perspectives.

Wasaga Beach Provincial Park has served as a vital recreational and natural space for decades. The proposal to remove key portions for downtown revitalization is deeply problematic. This would fragment the park, reducing its protected status and exposing sensitive ecosystems to unchecked development.

From an environmental standpoint, these changes threaten the area's biodiversity and natural features. The park includes critical habitats along the Nottawasaga River and Georgian Bay, supporting species like migratory birds and fish. Removing these beach areas could lead to increased erosion, habitat loss, and pollution from intensified tourism infrastructure, issues which have been highlighted in similar park redevelopments elsewhere in Ontario. For instance, such land transfers often result in higher foot traffic and construction, disrupting the long-standing balance of these coastal ecosystems that have remained relatively intact since the park's inception.

This isn't just about losing green space. It is about eroding the park's role as a stable, protected natural area that Ontarians have relied on for generations. Selling off these lands for commercial purposes sets a dangerous precedent, potentially accelerating urban sprawl in what was meant to be a conserved reserve.

As an Indigenous person, I see these amendments as a direct affront to values of land stewardship that are central to many First Nations teachings—principles that emphasize harmony with nature over exploitation. The transfer of Nancy Island focus from conservation to tourism-driven "revitalization." While this may boost local economies, it risks commodifying a site with deep cultural significance, including potential ties to Indigenous history in the region.

Canadian values, as reflected in reconciliation efforts and documents like the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action, call for meaningful consultation with Indigenous communities and protection of traditional lands. Yet, this proposal appears to sideline these priorities in favour of economic development. Outreach to Indigenous groups is mentioned, but without transparent evidence of how their input will shape outcomes, it feels tokenistic. This doesn't align with our shared commitment to environmental justice and cultural preservation—values that define us as Canadians.

In summary, these amendments favour profit over protection, undermining the park's legacy and our collective responsibility to future generations. I urge you to reject or significantly revise this proposal.

Thank you for time and effort to consider this complaint.