Comment
The proposed changes in ERO 013-5033 are very concerning. At this time we should be increasing the protection of endangered species, not weakening it. Delicate habitats and species, once lost, cannot simply be replaced. They must be protected, and are worth more than any industry, job, development, or dollar value.
I am particularly opposed to:
1. The cash-in-lieu "Conservation Fund." There is no replacement for endangered species. No cash-in-lieu options should be considered. If a development would harm species covered under this act, the development shouldn't happen, end of story.
2. Changing the requirements to be considered an Endangered Species. They should be maintained as they are, requiring science-based listing of species at risk (including Indigenous Traditional Knowledge), mandatory protection of threatened and endangered species and their habitats, and legislated timelines for planning and reporting.
3. Leaving Ministers with the authority to temporarily suspend species and habitat protections. This should be in the hands of 3rd party environmental experts, not the Minister.
Thank you for your time.
Please increase the protection of species in Ontario. It is our responsibility.
Supporting links
Submitted April 24, 2019 4:16 PM
Comment on
10th Year Review of Ontario’s Endangered Species Act: Proposed changes
ERO number
013-5033
Comment ID
27355
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status