Comment
I am in support of an extension as mentioned under section 55, however I do not believe two years will not be long enough to create a truly robust policy that mutually benefits all stake holders involved. I would recommend a five year extention, to ensure the new policy is the best it can possibly be, and one that is not rushed as this agreement will most likely have some longevity, as most agreements of this type typically last for a twenty five year period.
Please ensure to Consider the economical impacts, the people who utilize the lands for substanence as well as recreational use.
[Original Comment ID: 213247]
Submitted March 6, 2018 2:32 PM
Comment on
Amendments of Ontario Regulation 242/08 (General Regulation - Endangered Species Act, 2007) relating to forest operations in managed Crown forests, incorporating species recently listed to the Species at Risk in Ontario List, and safe harbour
ERO number
013-1669
Comment ID
3410
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status