Comment
I believe that cycling is a life skill and everyone should have the opportunity to learn how to cycle safely.
Cycling, like swimming, is not a skill one masters in a one-hour session or a one-time event. It requires incremental learning over a period of time.
I also believe that an education program is not complete unless it involves an on-road component.
Instructors must be trained based on CAN-BIKE principles.
The Cycling into the Future Program has been developed with the above beliefs in mind.
The on-road component is so vital. Think about driver education. We would never give someone a driver's licence with them only practicing and being tested in a parking lot. The same applies to cycling education.
I would also like to comment on "Childrens Safety Villages" at this time. These pieces are very costly. The infrastructure required to run them does not adequately simulate a real-life experience. The scale is small so children do not learn the time it takes to cross a road or see the speed of real traffic. Simulated bits can be set up at schools or community centres with follow-up on real residential streets.
I would strongly recommend that funds NOT be directed to these villages.
Also there is virtually no evaluation of outcomes of programs at these villages.
[Original Comment ID: 213388]
Submitted March 8, 2018 2:08 PM
Comment on
#CycleON: Action Plan 2.0
ERO number
013-1837
Comment ID
3821
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status