This proposal is very unfair…

This proposal is very unfair you shouldn’t have even used the The word fairness in your proposal a fair deal would be an equal deal between two parties that are involved the outfitters and the non-resident landowners this proposal is completely one sided to the outfitters you have not made an equal proposal for non-residents landowners. All you have done here is made a monopoly for outfitters to receive all the tags and make non-resident landowners purchase a more expensive bear tag through an outfitter to hunt their own property or to hunt the WMU that they have a cabin or property in some of these areas aren’t even provided with an outfitter that the properties of nonresident land owners are in. And some of the tracks of land that the outfitters have they’re not even using because they’re too far for them to travel and to do guiding services there so it is left up to the non-resident landowner to bear hunt those areas. You are lining the pockets of outfitters with nonresident land owners money and have forced nonresident landowners to go through an outfitter to hunt the WMU that their property is in. This proposal should’ve been called a monopoly for outfitters On the backs of non-resident landowners.
Sure the government has no problem making me pay tax on my land providing no services because of the remoteness of the property i.e. trash or dump services busing services road maintenance and now the one benefit we did have was able to get a tag to hunt bear you want to charge me more by going through an outfitter.
This proposal should have never had the word fairness in it it is completely unfair to nonresident landowners and one-sided to outfitters.
You have not taken in any thought or care into the evaluation of the amount of money a nonresident landowner puts into the economy such as buying property paying taxes building camps hiring contractors purchasing gas buying tags buying food going to their property for hunting privileges on a yearly basis all of that money is was never considered in this proposal.