Comment
It seems that these additions are too specific as if targeting certain lands and developments that are held up in the belt area therefore benefiting someone in particular or some entity. How will you achieve transparency in choosing where to remove and add? What are the statistics and data behind choosing the areas you designated as addition or removal? As it stands it does not look like this was a study based on the natural path of conservation or green belt requirement to save natural lands or farms.
Submitted November 11, 2022 10:36 PM
Comment on
Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan
ERO number
019-6216
Comment ID
66379
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status