The impacts discussed in the…

The impacts discussed in the ERO posting are notably silent with regards to analysis of the significant negative environmental, social and economic impacts related to wetland loss. The public requests that this analysis be conducted and further justification be provided related to this posting.

Natural heritage offsetting for wetlands is founded on a false assumption that compensation for wetland loss in one location can be adequately offset by creation in another location. These are not equal and do not result in no net loss. The ministry has adopted this type of model in other areas such as species at risk for butternut, which makes sense. This doesn't make sense. The public requests that more emphasis be placed on avoidance and mitigation rather than offsetting regarding wetlands.

Removing the requirement to consider species at risk in the designation of a wetland and protecting it is a mistake. I fear this will only result in further decline of species at risk and undermines the protection for these species. This goes against public interest. If a species at risk is present, no destruction of a wetland should be allowed.

I am extremely hesitant and skeptical about removing provincial oversight to the evaluation of wetlands and increasing the role of local municipalities. These local municipalities may not have the resources or appropriate knowledge to deal with these designations. Do they have the capacity for what you are asking? This really just seems like the government is trying to allow developers to push development into areas that are NOT in the public interest. Wetlands provide a required function in the Ecosystem and urban environment. I am afraid this will only result in developments that will be headaches in future years. Look at all the basement flooding projects being carried out in the City of Toronto in areas where development wasn't adequately planned. The public requests reconsideration of the capacity of municipalities and other local governments in administering this. Furthermore, it is requested that more development controls be put in place to protect homes and infrastructure in the watershed.

Most people do not want their communities and environment to be a strip mall or sea of houses. They want green spaces that foster a healthy environment. We should be looking to urban planning so make use of these natural environments as selling features within our communities rather than destroying them. I would like to see more holistic and sustainable development regulations.