1.1 Yes, I support the use…

1.1 Yes, I support the use of the digital building code compendium during BCIN exams.
1.2 As long as candidate can choose to use paper or digital OBC compendium, I have no concerns. I am used to the paper version and can find information faster than colleagues who are used to the digital version.
2.1 I have no issue with a slight increase in the amount of time per question, but don't think the number of questions should be sacrificed. Keep 75 questions and increase the time to 3:45.
3.1 I support pre-qualification training only if it is a college diploma program on building/engineering technology, not just OBC courses. Only understanding the Code but not the theory on why code requirements exist is like a doctor that understands medicines and how they affect the body, but not how the body functions and different parts affect each other. It's dangerous to understand only the OBC but think you can create a safe efficient building.
3.2 To limit barriers, the province could consider bursaries to reduce the cost of training. For example, the province reduces the cost for the training because there is a shortage of labour in this field. Or municipalities could offer contracts where they cover the cost of the education if the student agrees to a contract where they work for 3-5 years at that municipality after graduation. Many companies offer these types of incentives successfully to fill specialty roles.
4.1 I do not support BCIN exemptions for individuals. However I would support exemptions for professional associations who require proof of OBC knowledge to achieve membership. For example the OAA, PEO, AATO & OACETT.
4.2 Only membership with associations should be considered equivalent. The associations can assess their member's education and/or work experience to confirm eligibility. And the ministry should confirm that those associations have adequate OBC inclusions in their accreditation exams to earn the exemption.
5.1 I support restructuring the BCIN exams in a manner that is easier for prospective exam candidates to understand their area of practice. When I first tried to find scope of work for each BCIN it was not even openly confirmed on a website. I had to email and get information from an MMAH staff member.
5.2 It is still difficult to find information about what each BCIN exam contains and what the scope of work is for someone who holds that qualification. And easy to find and easy to understand summary website is desperately needed. It does not encourage new people into the profession if they can't easily find information about how to join it.
6.1 I would need details about what you mean specifically by asking BCIN practitioners to "attest to their knowledge". Just asking them to make a statement isn't enough. Many people would be willing to make a false statement. And what are the consequences if they don't make the attestation? Or if it's suspected they've lied? Why not require membership with a professional association as part of the BCIN process so that they are liable to that association for their CPD requirements and code of ethics?
6.2 As noted in item 3.1 above, limiting knowledge to OBC only is dangerous to public safety. Knowledge in all areas of building technology should be required.
6.3 Sharing information via mass email ie. "Code News" is sufficient for me.