Commentaire
The only way to reduce vehicle congestion/gridlock that is backed by data is to give people viable alternatives to driving. Slowing down the construction of cost-effective alternatives like bike lanes, which cost less to build and maintain than vehicle lanes, can only contribute to gridlock. I do not support the proposal to introduce provincial oversight over bike lane construction that only acts as a veto. If the government is serious about involving itself in municipal decisions about bike lanes then it should also be proposing routes that it finds meet its criteria.
The proposed highway 413 only serves to funnel more vehicles into already-gridlocked highways. Vehicle occupants wish to travel to destinations which cannot support the volume of vehicle traffic they already face, and constructing more lanes to handle the traffic volume requires taking valuable surface area from these destinations. I do not support the proposed 413 and I would instead like to see the government propose highway alignments which can bring existing traffic volume to new destinations which are not already congested.
Soumis le 22 octobre 2024 12:14 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
101499
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire