Commentaire
i’m so confused by this false information and misguided direction.
i thought government was supposed to improve our lives, not make it difficult and less safe - especially for vulnerable people.
there have been numerous studies that show how the addition of bike lanes and removal of car lanes not only saves travel time for all, but also reduces (often single occupant / no passenger) motor vehicle congestion / gridlock.
if we remove or prevent bike lanes, those same people (former ? cyclists) taking up less road space and requiring less infrastructure will only require more road space and more infrastructure to commute - causing more gridlock and increasing travel times for all.
there are even more studies that show that adding a motor vehicle traffic lane on any single roadway only adds to more cars on the road in general and more congestion everywhere.
under provincial jurisdiction, wouldn’t it be easier and more efficient to reduce gridlock and save commuting time by completing the transit projects long overdue, increasing frequency on existing transit lines, and installing bike lanes on provincial roads.
stay in your lane and stop scaring and hurting people - it’s really problematic.
Soumis le 22 octobre 2024 8:50 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
102370
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire