Commentaire
I am writing to express my deep concern and opposition to Section XII of the Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024. The provision that would require municipalities to seek provincial approval to construct or maintain bike lanes, particularly when they replace motor vehicle lanes, undermines the autonomy of municipalities like Toronto to make critical infrastructure decisions that prioritize safety, sustainability, and quality of life.
Bike lanes serve as vital infrastructure that protect cyclists from motor vehicle accidents, reduce congestion, and encourage environmentally friendly commuting options. The removal of bike lanes or the limitation of municipalities' ability to create new ones is a step backward in promoting road safety and reducing our carbon footprint. Protected bike lanes were designed to safeguard vulnerable road users, and stripping municipalities of the ability to manage their own streets will put countless lives at risk.
Moreover, allowing the Ministry to reject or review bike lane projects based on traffic flow, rather than safety and sustainability concerns, sends a clear message that the convenience of cars is being prioritized over the safety of cyclists and pedestrians. This bill appears to promote car dependency, which contradicts the goals of reducing traffic congestion and environmental impact.
I strongly urge the government to reconsider these changes, particularly in urban centers like Toronto where cycling infrastructure is critical to managing traffic and supporting sustainable transportation options.
Please reconsider Section XII, and allow municipalities to retain the authority to manage their own bike lanes without interference from the province.
Sincerely,
A concerned Toronto resident and cyclist
Soumis le 24 octobre 2024 11:54 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
104597
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire