Commentaire
enough pleeeaaaaasssseeee our province has so many more pressing issues this is not only a waste of time and resources but exemplifies a gross misunderstanding of what causes traffic congestion in the first place. I beg that someone more qualified be involved in a partnership with the municipal government to properly assess the roots of the issue and tailor a solution to our city's circumstance. This is so ridiculous I'm flabbergasted by how ignorant this proposal is. It is tone deaf to so many different issues. I know you like cars and money Doug but when our city is flooded or destroyed by hurricanes or burned to the ground in however long it takes climate change to get us it's gonna be pretty hard to go for a leisurely drive or spend any of that dough you've been raking in at the expense of Ontarians. Truly if you cared at ALL for the people that voted you into the place you are today, whatever their reasons were..., you would work on a carefully crafted solution that will aid users of a multitude of transportation types for the foreseeable future. This plan does not represent that. This decision does not represent a thoughtful analysis of the issue at hand. But it would be uncharacteristic of this government to act otherwise, I suppose. I grow tired of hearing about one moronic proposal after another. I'm not sure if anyone involved in this plan ACTUALLY believes it is going to help traffic congestion or if it's a wrung on the ladder of a longer game this part is playing at, but both are equally frustrating.
Soumis le 26 octobre 2024 6:53 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
106990
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire