Commentaire
Removing bike lanes on major corridors and restricting alternative transit options would be a step backward for sustainable, accessible transportation in our community. Bike lanes are critical for encouraging safe, healthy, and environmentally friendly travel choices. They offer an alternative to car trips, reducing congestion and emissions, and are essential in supporting those who rely on cycling for daily commutes or as a preferred transit option.
Eliminating bike lanes could discourage cycling and lead to increased vehicle traffic, further straining roadways and contributing to air pollution and noise in neighborhoods. Moreover, bike lanes play an important role in enhancing road safety for all users by providing clear, dedicated spaces for cyclists, which reduces the likelihood of accidents.
Alternative transit options are equally crucial, as they provide accessible choices for those who may not have a car or prefer not to rely on one. Limiting these options could make it harder for residents to connect with public transit, access key destinations, and adopt healthier, lower-carbon lifestyles.
Sustaining and expanding bike lanes and alternative transit pathways aligns with goals for a more livable, resilient city. By supporting a diverse range of transportation modes, we can ensure a safer, more efficient, and more inclusive transportation network that benefits everyone.
Soumis le 1 novembre 2024 10:42 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
109492
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire