Commentaire
People who cycle are not secondary to car drivers. Cyclists commute times, safety, and access are not addressed here. How are cyclists supposed to travel to their destinations without bike lanes on main roads to get them there safely?
How does a cyclist use side streets to get to work/store/school if main streets are the only route to these in places? Toronto wasn't built the way you are describing. If its not practical or feasible your plan doesn't work. If a cyclist uses a neighborhood side street, sure that sounds nice to maybe have a short leisurely ride for fun, but if it doesn't connect anywhere non-residential how can one travel anywhere useful on their bike?
This legislation makes no sense. Please throw it in the recycling. Maybe next time consult with experts and actual travellers who cycle in cities to make informed future legislation that makes sense.
MPPs vote NO!
Soumis le 1 novembre 2024 5:15 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
110185
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire