Commentaire
I do not support removing sections of the Bloor Street, Yonge Street, and University Avenue bike lanes. Removing the bike lanes would be a detrimental decision for several key reasons, including undermining safety, worsening circulation, and creating waste by dismantling recently installed infrastructure.
First, safety is a paramount concern when discussing urban transportation. Bike lanes are designed to provide a safer space for cyclists, who are among the most vulnerable road users. Studies consistently show that protected bike lanes reduce the likelihood of accidents involving cyclists and motor vehicles. By removing these bike lanes, the city would be increasing the risk of collisions, thereby endangering the lives of cyclists and pedestrians alike. Without dedicated bike lanes, cyclists would be forced to navigate through traffic, heightening their exposure to potential accidents. They may also choose to travel on sidewalks, endangering pedestrians. Moreover, the absence of bike lanes can create confusion among drivers, leading to dangerous situations. Prioritizing safety through infrastructure not only benefits cyclists but also contributes to a more secure environment for all road users, including pedestrians and motorists.
Second, improving the movement of all people is another critical argument against the removal of these bike lanes. Efficient urban mobility hinges on a balanced transportation system that accommodates various modes of travel, including cycling, walking, and driving. The presence of bike lanes encourages more people to cycle, alleviating congestion on public transit and roads. When cycling is made safer and more accessible, it promotes a shift toward sustainable modes of transportation, which can help reduce traffic congestion, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and improve health. Furthermore, a well-integrated bike lane network supports local businesses by attracting customers who arrive by bike. It enhances the overall urban experience by creating a more vibrant and active streetscape. Thus, maintaining these bike lanes is essential for fostering a transportation ecosystem that supports all forms of mobility and contributes to a healthier city.
Lastly, it would be wasteful to remove the bike lanes, particularly given the investment and resources that have gone into their recent installation. These bike lanes were designed with considerable public input and funding, reflecting a commitment to modernizing Toronto’s transportation infrastructure. Removing them not only undermines the time and effort spent in their planning and implementation but also sets a concerning precedent regarding future infrastructure investments. Taxpayer money should be utilized effectively, and dismantling existing bike lanes would squander public resources. Additionally, the removal process itself involves costs related to labour, materials, and logistics, further compounding the financial irresponsibility of such a decision.
In conclusion, removing sections of the Bloor Street, Yonge Street, and University Avenue bike lanes would compromise safety, undermine the movement of all people, and be an unnecessary waste of resources. Upholding and enhancing these bike lanes is essential for fostering a safer, more efficient, and sustainable urban environment in Toronto.
Soumis le 1 novembre 2024 5:53 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
110226
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire