Commentaire
1. I don't have any interest in the provincial government once again meddling in municipal affairs.
2. I have children that use these bike lanes, and it'll be a real shame to spend our money to make them less safe on the roads, thanks.
3. More roads = more cars. We don't need more roads, we need more bikes, transit, and active ways to get around. Think how busy your roads are going to get when all these people on bikes start buying cars to feel safe. Go look at any major city that works well, and you'll see that more cars is not what they've done. London, Dublin, New York. All move millions of people daily and do it with a mixed model that frankly is miles ahead of us. Stepping backwards so Joe on Bloor can drive his giant pickup is not helpful. No offence Joe, but I don't like your pickup truck either.
4. The university bike lanes are beautiful. We spent how freaking long ripping that whole stretch up and now.. let's do it again. You have all lost it. Just get on the damn subway like the rest of us and quit complaining. Ya congestion sucks, so get in the tunnel and rip downtown. Stop waiting money and whining.
Soumis le 2 novembre 2024 8:14 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
110644
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire