Commentaire
"Ontario is looking to fight gridlock and get drivers where they need to go faster." This line is the most offensive part of the proposal. This is not a provincial issue, but a direct attack on downtown Toronto.
Without safe efficient alternate transportation routes, such as the bike lanes proposed for removal, how should the current cycling population be expected to move around the Toronto? Prioritizing driving suggests more people will be pushed to drive, nullifying any proposed reduction to congestion.
And why should drivers be prioritized? Toronto has a solid public transit network. If drivers are frustrated, they should be considering alternative commute options like the subway or streetcar.
More cars = more traffic. We should be celebrating any reduction to number of vehicles on the roads.
Soumis le 2 novembre 2024 11:39 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
110850
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire