Commentaire
This bill is a bad idea. Cycling infrastructure, especially for Bloor, Yonge, and University, is built to protect cyclists where cars have killed them. The need for this infrastructure is written in blood and calculated in peoples' lives.
Cycling infrastructure increases freedom of mobility, especially for people who can't afford or can't drive a car. They decrease congestion by providing an alternative to adding another car to the roads.
Benefits of cycling infrastructure aside, this bill infringes on the jurisdiction of municipalities. How can the province claim to know better than the municipality when it comes to the needs and wants of their residents? The addendum is especially bad when the province will require the City of Toronto to remove existing (and especially nice) cycling infrastructure on the three most used and key routes.
Please rescind this bill, or at least the addendum that would remove routes!
Liens connexes
Soumis le 3 novembre 2024 10:05 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
111870
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire