I am writing to express my…

I am writing to express my concern and opposition to the proposed bill regarding the removal of bike lanes in Toronto. This proposal is short-sighted, especially when considering the critical role that bike infrastructure plays in the development of world-class cities and in addressing the transportation needs of modern urban populations.

Bike lanes are an essential component of a sustainable urban transportation system. They are a means to reduce traffic congestion, lower greenhouse gas emissions, promote healthy living, and enhance overall quality of life in cities. Toronto, like many other cosmopolitan cities around the world, should be striving to support these outcomes by completing and expanding its cycling infrastructure, not dismantling it. Currently, Toronto’s bike lanes lack crucial connectivity and continuity, leaving many of our city’s residents unable to rely on cycling as a consistent or safe mode of transportation. With a complete and cohesive network, we could see a marked increase in bicycle usage, as has been demonstrated in other leading cities such as Amsterdam, Copenhagen, and New York City. Yes, you read that right New York City. Let's go into detail on that, as without knowing, you might find that to be an inaccurate statement or perhaps, even, not true. Well, New York City has made significant strides in developing a robust cycling infrastructure over the past few decades, resulting in notable growth in cycling for both commuting and recreational purposes. Currently, NYC has more than 1,500 miles of bike lanes, of which over 600 miles are protected lanes, helping reduce cycling risks in busy urban areas. Protected bike lanes have not only improved safety but also reduced traffic congestion and travel times for other vehicles in certain corridors. For example, the addition of bike lanes on 8th Avenue reduced travel times for cars by 14%, highlighting the benefit of dedicated cycling infrastructure even for non-cyclists. New York City's success underscores the importance of a consistent, connected infrastructure that encourages cycling as a viable mode of urban transportation.

It is also worth questioning the legitimacy of this initiative at the provincial level. The municipal government is much closer to the needs and preferences of Toronto’s residents and should be the primary authority on decisions regarding local bike lanes. The involvement of the provincial government in this matter seems out of place and appears to set a concerning precedent of overreach. If any government body were to oversee such decisions, it would be more appropriate for federal authorities to provide guidelines supporting sustainability goals that align with national and international standards.

The proposal to remove bike lanes reflects a fundamental misalignment with the values of urban growth and environmental responsibility. This recalls other poorly conceived initiatives, such as the recent (implemented and reversed) changes to Ontario’s vehicle license plates—a project that was costly, poorly executed, and ultimately scrapped. Such decisions are a waste of both public resources and government focus, casting doubt on the credibility and priorities of those in power.

You need to reconsider this proposal and to instead focus efforts on completing and enhancing Toronto’s cycling infrastructure. Investing in a connected and accessible bike lane network will create a safer, more resilient city and contribute positively to Toronto’s role as a modern, forward-thinking urban center.

Thank you for your time and consideration.