Commentaire
This bill stands as a clear example of the hypocrisy in our current transportation policies. It forces cities and municipalities to seek provincial approval for bike lanes and critical infrastructure improvements that could significantly ease traffic congestion. At the same time, the province dismisses the need to support the construction of four-plexes across the province, claiming that municipalities should have the freedom to make their own decisions. I firmly oppose this bill, as it fosters the misguided notion that cars are the only legitimate form of transportation.
The belief that expanding our already overcrowded highway network will resolve gridlock is fundamentally flawed. The 401 is not just North America’s busiest highway; it is also the widest in several areas. Rushing to increase highway spending and construction will only exacerbate our traffic issues.
Investing this money in our rail network, on the other hand, would generate jobs, position the province as a leader in transportation innovation, and provide a sustainable long-term solution to congestion.
1. The provincial government must eliminate the obstacles that undermine local efforts to expand transportation options.
2. Bike lanes are as crucial as sidewalks in our transportation infrastructure, and I use them daily.
3. Instead of adding more vehicles to our roads, we should prioritize safety and create accessible options for vulnerable road users.
4. When I drive, I prefer to see cyclists safely in their designated bike lanes rather than navigating through traffic.
5. Bike lanes also enhance public transit by making it easier for people to access transit stations.
Soumis le 4 novembre 2024 7:54 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps – Loi de 2024 sur la construction plus rapide de voies publiques
Numéro du REO
019-9265
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
112932
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire