Commentaire
In 21st century, with all the accumulated knowledge about urban planning and human behaviors, we should be introducing laws based on exact science and confirmed reports, not by sole prejudice and entitlement protection. Not a single city or developed country has ever abolished safety of one class of citizens (health and environment councius citizenst that care about their own community) to grant pure privilege to another class (car owners get to move a tiny bit faster through neighborhood they do not interact with). This is shameless pandering to privileged people only, and I'm direct conflict with definition of "good governance". What is next, removing trees to lay more asphalt and paving over playgrounds to have more parking space?
Every MPP supporting this with vote should get immediate order by province to replace whole front and back yard in their residence with parking space for people that could potentially be passing by in cars and needing parking.
Province needs to make sure cities are thriving by alocting fair amount of collected taxes to them and not siphoning off all taxes collected in city to subsidize rural and suburban. Any urban decisions on transportation and zoning should be left to cities themselves.
Soumis le 5 novembre 2024 8:42 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
113421
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire