Commentaire
I am writing to express my strong opposition to Bill 212, the Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act. While I recognize the importance of addressing congestion, this bill overlooks essential aspects of sustainable urban planning and environmental health.
Firstly, the removal of existing bike lanes in Toronto will deter active transportation, an option many residents depend on for commuting safely and sustainably. Active transportation reduces traffic congestion and contributes to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Removing bike lanes will hinder these benefits, increasing car dependency and adding strain to already congested roads.
Secondly, Bill 212’s exemption of certain highway projects from environmental assessments raises significant concerns. Environmental assessments are crucial for safeguarding our ecosystems, protecting biodiversity, and ensuring developments do not harm local air, soil, and water quality. The proposed changes could result in highways that ignore environmental risks, contributing to long-term environmental degradation.
Bill 212’s approach could set a troubling precedent for prioritizing short-term convenience over sustainable development. I urge you to reconsider this legislation and support solutions that balance infrastructure improvements with environmental and community needs.
Thank you for considering my concerns.
Soumis le 7 novembre 2024 10:47 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
114131
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire