Commentaire
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the Ontario government’s proposed framework that would mandate the removal of bike lanes on key streets in Toronto, as well as potentially other existing bike lanes across the province. While I understand the government's focus on reducing gridlock and improving the flow of motor vehicle traffic, this proposal fundamentally undermines efforts to create more sustainable, equitable, and safe transportation options in our cities. In addition, it would be an irresponsible use of public funds and distracts from other measures that may reduce traffic in a more sustainable manner.
Bike lanes are vital for ensuring the safety of cyclists, especially in busy urban areas. These lanes provide a designated, protected space for cyclists, reducing accidents involving pedestrians and cyclists, and minimizing overall traffic-related injuries. Removing bike lanes will put cyclists at greater risk and undermine public confidence in biking as a safe, viable mode of transport. As a driver, bike lanes provide me with a tremendous amount of comfort. Even when both driver and cyclist are driving carefully, unexpected accidents may occur, and the separation that the bike lanes provide could very well be what saves the life of a cyclist in the event of an accident.
The proposed review process and criteria for the removal of bike lanes also lacks clarity and transparency. The reliance on a set of criteria to be developed in future guidance or regulations raises concerns about the consistency and fairness of the decision-making process. Municipalities and local communities should have a clear, transparent say in any changes to existing infrastructure. The decision to remove bike lanes should not be made solely by the provincial government without the meaningful input of the communities most impacted by these changes, including cyclists, pedestrians, and local residents.
The government’s emphasis on expanding highways and removing bike lanes fails to address the root causes of urban congestion. Adding more vehicle lanes is a short-term solution that could exacerbate long-term congestion and pollution, while also further encouraging car dependency. In a city like Toronto that is quickly growing, measures that address the core causes of congestion is needed. In only a number of years, any improvement that could potentially result from removing a bike lane may be lost simply as a result of the number, location and nature of residential developments in the city. In addition, the significantly increased safety risk that would be present as a result of a bike lane being removed may incentivize more residents to drive or resort to taxis/ride shares, resulting in increased congestion once again.
Soumis le 14 novembre 2024 1:17 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
115708
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire