Commentaire
You are actively setting the entire province back years in cycling safety and progress and money spent on existing bike lanes would be wasted.
2. Bike lanes are essential infrastructure like sidewalks
3. You are adding more red tape to an already bloated and slow process for improving traffic options, wasting taxpayers dollars in the process, and killing active plans that have been in progress for years.
4. It is much simpler and safer for cars and bikes to be separated, having bike lanes allows this.
5. Bike lanes support transit options, allowing people to safely reach Public transit hubs from further away. This greatly increases each transit hubs range.
6. Bikes are a low cost, method of transport that enables people of all types to move on their accord. Bike lanes allow people the freedom to bike safety.
7. Removing bike lanes increased car traffic by decreasing alternative transport options.
8. This will kill people. Bike lanes are keeping people safe, combined traffic will cause more serious accidents as motor traffic in inherently dangerous and life threatening to everyone not in a car
9. Bikes do not pollute, and cause a negligible amount of damage to the road surface, unlike motor traffic.
Soumis le 14 novembre 2024 6:31 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
115815
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire